Biden authorizes use of US long-range missiles by Ukraine for strikes inside Russia.
I don’t know who among you is related to Zalmay Khalilzad, but he’s your best bet.
With Donald Trump’s return to the U.S. presidency, the United States and the West face renewed opportunities and challenges in their approach to Afghanistan.
https://foreignpolicy.com/2024/11/14/diplomacy-waltz-taliban-afghanistan-trump/
Moderna, Novovax stocks fall after RFK Jr. nominated to lead HHS.
Trump selects Jay Clayton for US Attorney of SDNY.
Categories
Trump selects RFK Jr. for HHS
Trump selects RFK Jr. for HHS.
Trump declines to include JP Dimon in a future Trump administration.
Categories
Presidential Power over Congress
Presidential Power over Congress.
The U.S. President does not have the power to unilaterally adjourn both houses of Congress under normal circumstances. However, the Constitution does grant the President a specific, rarely used power to adjourn Congress in a limited situation:
Article II, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution states that if there is a disagreement between the House of Representatives and the Senate about the timing of adjournment, the President has the authority to adjourn them to a time he considers “proper.” This situation would arise only if the two chambers cannot agree on when to adjourn, which is highly unusual.
In practice, Congress sets its own adjournment dates, and this presidential power has never been exercised in U.S. history. Normally, both the House and Senate would negotiate any adjournment disagreements without requiring presidential intervention.
This power has never been exercised in U.S. history. While Article II, Section 3 of the Constitution grants the President the authority to adjourn Congress if the House and Senate cannot agree on an adjournment date, no president has ever used this power.
Throughout U.S. history, Congress has always managed to reach an agreement on its adjournment schedule, avoiding any need for presidential intervention. This power remains one of the Constitution’s more obscure provisions, theoretically available but practically unused.
The Supreme Court has not directly ruled on the president’s constitutional power to adjourn Congress under Article II, Section 3 or provided a detailed interpretation of it. Since no president has ever attempted to use this power, there has been no occasion for a legal challenge or a Supreme Court ruling to clarify its scope or constitutionality.
However, the Court generally interprets the Constitution’s text and historical context as the foundation for understanding presidential powers. If a president were to try to adjourn Congress in the future and it led to a dispute, the Supreme Court might then consider the case, potentially confirming the boundaries or conditions of this power.
In the absence of judicial interpretation, this adjournment power remains a hypothetical and untested aspect of presidential authority.
Trump allies threaten to adjourn Congress under A2-S3 to allow recess appointments.